The performance of the second
generation post-colonial amalgam of modern nation administrations in Africa was
tied to the experiential reality of its leaders rather than the institutional
capacity of its polity. Each leader believed they were better than the former
and certainly superior than the other leaving little room for the wisdom of
consensus to emerge on any matter under the sun. This meant that the potential
of these nations always remained greater than their performance.
This may be a good sign though, in that leadership in Africa, can only improve as demanded by its polity over time. Indeed, in another two generations it may seem quite odd that leadership in African ever displayed the political morass that is perhaps characteristic of the present. A great hope, but a good hope nonetheless.
As both the empowerment and
expectations of the people buoy each other in voice, deed and increasing demand,
leadership will be forced to deliver higher levels of institutional performance
rather than depend on the fragility of its leaders. This is leadership beyond
the leader. Depending on the fragility of the person rather than the purpose
and function of the position is bound to be a disappointing show in the short
run and an ill-advised choice in the long run.
Allan Bukusi
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for sharing in this conversation